J Jorvantis
STRUCTURE

Building a file someone else could pick up

By Wanyonyi Adhiambo · 10 August 2026 · 4 min read

A binder of organised paper records with tabs

A long inquiry accumulates a great deal of paper — and, these days, a great deal that is only digital. Interview notes, filings, screenshots of pages that may later change, correspondence with press offices, dates jotted in the margins of a notebook. The work itself may be sound, but if none of it is organised, the reasoning behind the final piece lives only in the reporter's head. That's a fragile place for it to sit.

A documentation bundle exists to fix that. Its purpose is simple to state and genuinely demanding to build: someone who wasn't in the room — an editor doing a final check, a lawyer assessing risk before publication — should be able to follow the reasoning from source to conclusion without needing you to explain it out loud.

Indexing every document with its provenance

Start with an index, not a folder of loose files. Every document gets an entry: what it is, where it came from, and the date it was obtained. "Obtained from" matters as much as the document itself — a filing pulled from an official register carries different weight than one forwarded by an interested party, and the index should make that distinction visible at a glance rather than requiring someone to ask.

Recording verification steps as you go, not after

Every claim that will end up in the finished piece should trace back to a verification step logged at the time it happened, not reconstructed from memory weeks later. A short note — what was checked, against what, and what the result was — takes a minute to write and can be the difference between a claim that holds and one that quietly can't be defended when it's challenged.

Correspondence deserves the same treatment. Every message sent to a party named in the inquiry, and every reply or non-reply received, belongs in a log with dates attached. This isn't bureaucracy for its own sake — it's the record that shows the subject of the inquiry was given a fair chance to respond, which matters both ethically and practically.

Assembling the bundle for someone else

Once the pieces exist, the final step is arrangement: index first, source documents next in the order the index references them, then the verification log, then the correspondence log. A reviewer working through it should never need to ask "where did this come from" — the answer should already be sitting one page away.

Working on a longer inquiry?

The Investigation Documentation Programme rebuilds your existing material into a bundle like this.

Get in touch